Max Horkheimer’s utopia between criticism of the real and abstract thinking

Governare la Paura. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 9 (1) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1930, in Anfänge der bürgerlichen Geschichtsphilosophie, Horkheimer analyzes utopia in bourgeois philosophy of history and identifies two aspects: the criticism of what is, and the representation of what should be. Utopia therefore plays a revolutionary role in history. In 1937, in Traditionelle und kritische Theorie, Horkheimer changes opinion. Utopia is criticized as misleading, acquiescent to reality. In later writings, in a pessimistic view, the Director of the Frankfurt School describes contemporary society as a dystopia.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Horkheimer's Criticism of Husserl.Habip Türker - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (7):619-635.
From Eden to Utopia. A Morphology of the Utopian Genre.Corin Braga - 2016 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 15 (44):3-32.
Truth and Utopia.Philip Goodchild - 2006 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2006 (134):64-82.
La utopía neoliberal y sus críticos.Jorge Vergara Estévez - 2005 - Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 10 (31):37-62.
Utopia, Counter-Utopia.Thomas Osborne - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (1):123-136.
In Defense of Utopia.Lyman Tower Sargent - 2006 - Diogenes 53 (1):11-17.
Walter Benjamin and Max Horkheimer: From Utopia to Redemption.Ilan Gur-Ze'ev - 1999 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 8 (1):119-155.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-22

Downloads
24 (#644,297)

6 months
4 (#793,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references