Comments on Sterba’s “The Michigan Cases and Furthering the Justification of Affirmative Action”

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (1):35-38 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In my comments on Prof. Sterba’s paper, I argue that evidence about the educational value of racial preferences reveals not that these policies produce good educational outcomes, but that schools use racial preferences regardless of whether they produce desirable outcomes. I further argue that in the absence of objective evidence about the value of racial preferences, proponents of these policies tend to rely on personal anecdotes. Often, these anecdotes reveal complex institutional and personal motives having little to do with the objective value of racial diversity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Michigan Cases and Furthering the Justification for Affirmative Action.James P. Sterba - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (1):1-12.
Defending affirmative action, defending preferences.James P. Sterba - 2003 - Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (2):285–300.
Affirmative Inaction? The Aftermath of Grutter and Gratz.Richard A. Jones - 2004 - Radical Philosophy Review 7 (2):179-193.
The Nature of Claims About Race and the Debate Over Racial Preferences.Terence J. Pell - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (1):13-26.
Affirmative action, meritocracy, and efficiency.Steven N. Durlauf - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (2):131-158.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
61 (#262,945)

6 months
13 (#191,601)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references