Logic of informal provability with truth values

Logic Journal of the IGPL 31 (1):172-193 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Classical logic of formal provability includes Löb’s theorem, but not reflection. In contrast, intuitions about the inferential behavior of informal provability (in informal mathematics) seem to invalidate Löb’s theorem and validate reflection (after all, the intuition is, whatever mathematicians prove holds!). We employ a non-deterministic many-valued semantics and develop a modal logic T-BAT of an informal provability operator, which indeed does validate reflection and invalidates Löb’s theorem. We study its properties and its relation to known provability-related paradoxical arguments. We also argue that T-BAT is a fairly sensible candidate for a formal logic of informal provability.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-09

Downloads
16 (#935,433)

6 months
29 (#110,451)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Pawel Pawlowski
Ghent University
Rafal Urbaniak
University of Gdansk

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mathematical rigor and proof.Yacin Hamami - 2022 - Review of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):409-449.
Reliability of mathematical inference.Jeremy Avigad - 2020 - Synthese 198 (8):7377-7399.
Why Do We Prove Theorems?Yehuda Rav - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (1):5-41.
On formal and informal provability.Hannes Leitgeb - 2009 - In Ø. Linnebo O. Bueno (ed.), New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 263--299.

View all 37 references / Add more references