Montague’s Paradox, Informal Provability, and Explicit Modal Logic

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 55 (2):157-196 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to explore the significance of Montague’s paradox—that is, any arithmetical theory $T\supseteq Q$ over a language containing a predicate $P$ satisfying $P\rightarrow \varphi $ and $T\vdash \varphi \,\therefore\,T\vdash P$ is inconsistent—as a limitative result pertaining to the notions of formal, informal, and constructive provability, in their respective historical contexts. To this end, the paradox is reconstructed in a quantified extension $\mathcal {QLP}$ of Artemov’s logic of proofs. $\mathcal {QLP}$ contains both explicit modalities $t:\varphi $ and also proof quantifiers $x:\varphi $. In this system, the basis for the rule NEC is decomposed into a number of distinct principles governing how various modes of reasoning about proofs and provability can be internalized within the system itself. A conceptually motivated resolution to the paradox is proposed in the form of an argument for rejecting the unrestricted rule NEC on the basis of its subsumption of an intuitively invalid principle pertaining to the interaction of proof quantifiers and the proof-theorem relation expressed by explicit modalities

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explicit modal logic, informal provability and Montague's Paradox.W. Dean - forthcoming - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic.
The knower paradox in the light of provability interpretations of modal logic.Paul Égré - 2004 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (1):13-48.
Realization of Intuitionistic Logic by Proof Polynomials.Sergei N. Artemov - 1999 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 9 (2-3):285-301.
A proof–theoretic study of the correspondence of hybrid logic and classical logic.H. Kushida & M. Okada - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (1):35-61.
Rosser-Type Undecidable Sentences Based on Yablo’s Paradox.Taishi Kurahashi - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (5):999-1017.
Explicit provability and constructive semantics.Sergei N. Artemov - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):1-36.
The Fixed Point Property in Modal Logic.Lorenzo Sacchetti - 2001 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 42 (2):65-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-24

Downloads
67 (#243,580)

6 months
11 (#241,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Walter Dean
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Peter Schroeder-Heister & Thomas Piecha (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
The Paradox of the Knower revisited.Walter Dean & Hidenori Kurokawa - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (1):199-224.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Outline of a theory of truth.Saul Kripke - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic.Saul Kripke - 1963 - Acta Philosophica Fennica 16:83-94.
Explicit provability and constructive semantics.Sergei N. Artemov - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):1-36.
Why Do We Prove Theorems?Yehuda Rav - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (1):5-41.

View all 29 references / Add more references