Comparative Philosophy 8 (2):65-89 (2017)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Zeno’s Arrow and Nāgārjuna’s Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way Chapter 2 contain paradoxical, dialectic arguments thought to indicate that there is no valid explanation of motion, hence there is no physical or generic motion. There are, however, diverse interpretations of the latter text, and I argue they apply to Zeno’s Arrow as well. I also find that many of the interpretations are dependent on a mathematical analysis of material motion through space and time. However, with modern philosophy and physics we find that the link from no explanation to no phenomena is invalid and that there is a valid explanation and understanding of physical motion. Hence, those arguments are both invalid and false, which banishes the MMK/2 and The Arrow under this and derivative interpretations to merely the history of philosophy. However, a view that maintains their relevance is that each is used as a koan or sequence of koans designed to assist students in spiritual meditation practice. This view is partly justified by the realization that both Nāgārjuna and Zeno were likely meditation masters in addition to being logicians. The works are, therefore, not works that should be assessed as having valid arguments and true conclusions by the standards of modern analytic philosophy—contrary to some of the literature—but rather are therapeutic and perhaps more appropriately considered as part of an experientially focused philosophy such as existentialism, phenomenology or religion.
|
Keywords | Zeno Nagarjuna Philosophy of Science Science and Buddhism Science and Religion |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Our Knowledge of the External World: As a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy.Bertrand Russell - 1914 - Chicago and London: Routledge.
Nagarjuna's Madhyamaka: A Philosophical Introduction.Jan Westerhoff - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
View all 37 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Time is Double the Trouble: Zeno’s Moving Rows.Barbara Sattler - 2015 - Ancient Philosophy 35 (1):1-22.
Nāgārjuna’s Arguments on Motion Revisited.Jan Westerhoff - 2008 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 36 (4):455-479.
Zeno of Elea: Where Space, Time, Physics, and Philosophy Converge An Everyman’s Introduction to an Unsung Hero of Philosophy.William Turner - unknown
Why Mathematical Solutions of Zeno’s Paradoxes Miss The Point: Zeno’s One and Many Relation and Parmenides’ Prohibition.Alba Papa-Grimaldi - 1996 - Review of Metaphysics 50 (2):299 - 314.
The Deceptive Simplicity of Nāgārjuna's Arguments Against Motion: Another Look at Mūlamadhyamakakārikā Chapter 2.Dan Arnold - 2012 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 40 (5):553-591.
An Epistemological Use of Nonstandard Analysis to Answer Zeno's Objections Against Motion.William I. McLaughlin & Sylvia L. Miller - 1992 - Synthese 92 (3):371 - 384.
Moving Without Being Where You’Re Not; A Non-Bivalent Way.Constantin Antonopoulos - 2004 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (2):235-259.
Moving Without Being Where You 'Re Not; a Non-Bivalent Way'.Constantin Antonopoulos - 2004 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (2):235 - 259.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-07-30
Total views
299 ( #35,426 of 2,506,844 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #17,661 of 2,506,844 )
2017-07-30
Total views
299 ( #35,426 of 2,506,844 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #17,661 of 2,506,844 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads