Are There Really Instantaneous Velocities?

The Monist 83 (2):187-208 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Zeno argued that since at any instant an arrow does not change its location, the arrow does not move at any time, and hence motion is impossible. I discuss the following three views that one could take in view of Zeno's argument:(i) the "at-at" theory, according to which there is no such thing as instantaneous velocity, while motion in the sense of the occupation of different locations at different times is possible,(ii) the "impetus" theory, according to which instantaneous velocities do exist but these are only contingently and causally related to the temporal developments of positions,(iii) the "no instants" theory, according to which instants in time do not exist, and hence instantaneous velocities do not exist, while motion, in the sense of different areas occupied during different time intervals, is possible.I argue that, despite the fact that there have been interesting and relevant developments in mathematics and physics since the time of Zeno, each of these views still has serious drawbacks

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are instantaneous velocities real and really instantaneous?: An argument for the affirmative.R. S. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2):261-280.
Are instantaneous velocities real and really instantaneous?: an argument for the affirmative.Sheldon R. Smith - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2):261-280.
An arbitrarily short reply to Sheldon Smith on instantaneous velocities.Frank Arntzenius - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2):281-282.
Instantaneous motion.John W. Carroll - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 110 (1):49 - 67.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
392 (#29,186)

6 months
12 (#77,954)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank Arntzenius
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Some Consequences of Physics for the Comparative Metaphysics of Quantity.David John Baker - 2020 - In Karen Bennett & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics Volume 12. Oxford University Press. pp. 75-112.
Flat Physicalism.Meir Hemmo & Orly Shenker - 2022 - Theoria 88 (4):743-764.
Against pointillisme about mechanics.Jeremy Butterfield - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (4):709-753.
A puzzle about rates of change.David Builes & Trevor Teitel - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (10):3155-3169.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics and the Psychological Arrow of Time.Meir Hemmo & Orly Shenker - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (1):85-107.

View all 49 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Non-standard Analysis.Gert Heinz Müller - 1966 - Princeton University Press.
Non-Standard Analysis.Gert Heinz Müller - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (2):292-294.
Logical Atoms and Combinatorial Possibility.Brian Skyrms - 1993 - Journal of Philosophy 90 (5):219-232.
Physical Science in the Middle Ages.Edward Grant - 1980 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 42 (3):600-601.

View all 7 references / Add more references