Honesty and Intimacy in Kant’s Duty of Friendship

International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):417-424 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The relationship between intimacy and honesty seems a paradoxical one. While intimate relationships would seem to demand a high level of honesty, this same intimacy might make us more likely to shield the other or protect ourselves through benevolent lying or the withholding of information. It would seem that honesty may not always be the best policy in intimate relationships. The purpose of this article is to examine the tension between honesty and intimacy in Kant’s duty of friendship, and it will highlight the limitations of Kant’s expectations of friendship. At the same time I will use Kant’s own appeal to the autonomy of moral agents to delineate an appropriate role for the obligations of honesty and self disclosure in friendship.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aristotle’s Theory of Friendship Tested.Syra Mehdi - 2015 - Questions: Philosophy for Young People 15:11-13.
Friendship, Intimacy and Humor.Mordechai Gordon - 2014 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 46 (2):162-174.
Friendship and the grounds of reasons.Diane Jeske - 2008 - Les Ateliers de L’Ethique 3 (1):61-69.
Telling the truth.J. Jackson - 1991 - Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (1):5-9.
Intimacy as freedom.Harry Blatterer - 2016 - Thesis Eleven 132 (1):62-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
156 (#125,804)

6 months
13 (#219,656)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references