Abstract

The authority of money laundering case’s prosecutors mentioned in article 68 Law Nr. 8 Year 2010 concerning the prevention and eradication of money laundering. The formulation remains unclear and needs further juridical interpretation. Based on the result of research, it can be concluded that the prosecutor’s authority formulated in article 68 Law Nr. 8 Year 2010 concerning the prevention and eradication of money laundering contains of weaknesses as follow : (1)in indictment making process, (2) in case’s handing over process and (3) in transaction blockaging. The juridical implication that appear is the technical regulation should be dismissed since they are in contrary with higher regulation (Law Nr. 8 Year 2010 concerning the prevention and eradication of money laundering). With regards to this condition, the best future formulation for prosecutor’s authority is appliying Indonesian Criminal Procedure Codification (KUHAP), since it can decrease the authority overlap between District Attorney and Corruption Eradication Commission. Keywords : Formulation, authority, prosecutor.