- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Rejoinder to Adam Reed, "Not Even False: A Commentary on Parrish and Toner" (Spring 2008): What's Good for the Goose and Related Matters
Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 9 (2):395 - 415 (2008)
Abstract
This is a response to Adam Reed's critique ("Not Even False," The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, Spring 2008) of Parrish's essay, "God and Objectivism" (The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, Spring 2007). Parrish argues that Reed ignores most of his critical points with regard to Objectivism, while committing several fallacies and embracing his own arbitrary positionsLinks
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Rejoinder to Adam Reed, "Not Even False: A Commentary on Parrish and Toner" (Spring 2008): God-Talk and the Arbitrary.Patrick Toner - 2008 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 9 (2):417 - 421.
Reply to Stephen E. Parrish, "God and Objectivism: A Critique of Objectivist Philosophy of Religion" (Spring 2007) and Patrick Toner, "Objectivist Atheology" (Spring 2007): Not Even False: A Commentary on Parrish and Toner. [REVIEW]Adam Reed - 2008 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 9 (2):361-394.
Reply to Stephen E. Parrish, "God and Objectivism: A Critique of Objectivist Philosophy of Religion" (Spring 2007) and Patrick Toner, "Objectivist Atheology" (Spring 2007): Not Even False: A Commentary on Parrish and Toner. [REVIEW]Adam Reed - 2008 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 9 (2):361 - 394.
A Critique Of Objectivist Metaethics.Stephen Parrish - 2002 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (8):305-320.
Rejoinder to Greg Nyquist, "Rand and Empirical Responsibility" (Fall 2006): Nyquist Contra Rand, Part II.Fred Seddon - 2006 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (1):121 - 122.
Reply to Jonathan Jacobs: Contesting a Review.David Kelley - 2002 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4 (1):237 - 239.
Rejoinder to Robert Hartford, "Objectivity and the Proof of Egoism" (Spring 2007): A Brief Comment on Hartford.Tibor R. Machan - 2007 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (2):305-306.
Rejoinder to Robert Hartford, "Objectivity and the Proof of Egoism" (Spring 2007): A Brief Comment on Hartford.Tibor R. Machan - 2007 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (2):305 - 306.
Rejoinder to Robert Hartford, "Objectivity and the Proof of Egoism" (Spring 2007): Rand's Metaethics.Douglas B. Rasmussen - 2007 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (2):307 - 316.
Rejoinder to Robert Hartford, "Objectivity and the Proof of Egoism" (Spring 2007): Rand's Metaethics.Douglas B. Rasmussen - 2007 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 8 (2):307-316.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-09-29
Downloads
6 (#1,480,551)
6 months
4 (#1,005,419)
2013-09-29
Downloads
6 (#1,480,551)
6 months
4 (#1,005,419)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-5pqs9 uwo