“Taming the Wild Profusion of Existing Things”?: A Study of Foucault, Power, and Human/Animal Relationships

Environmental Ethics 23 (4):339-358 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I explore how some aspects of Foucoult’s work on power can be applied to human/animal power relations. First, I argue that because animals behave as “beings that react” and can respond in different ways to human actions, in principle at least, Foucoult’s work can offer insights into human/animal power relations. However, many of these relations fall into the category of “domination,” in which animals are unable to respond. Second, I examine different kinds of human power practices, in particular, ways in which humans construct animal constitutions and animal subjectivities. Finally, I use a case study of a pet cat to show how such power practices may come together in a single instance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
171 (#113,400)

6 months
17 (#148,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Clare Alexandra Palmer
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

Pervasive Captivity and Urban Wildlife.Nicolas Delon - 2020 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 23 (2):123-143.
Animal capabilities and freedom in the city.Nicolas Delon - 2021 - Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 22 (1):131-153.
The Ethics of Touch and the Importance of Nonhuman Relationships in Animal Agriculture.Steve Cooke - 2021 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (2):1-20.
Colonization, urbanization, and animals.Clare Palmer - 2003 - Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):47 – 58.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references