Just Policy Paralysis?

Animal Sentience 3 (27) (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Treves et al. (2019) argue that policy making should include the interests and well-being of present and future generations of humans and nonhumans. There are deep and abiding conflicts of interest both between and within these groups. Trying to factor in so many considerations is likely to generate political gridlock. The authors need to explain how to avoid this.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justice Between Generations.John William Clark Wolf - 1993 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Public Policy: Ethics.Andrzej Klimczuk - 2015 - In James D. Wright (ed.), Public Policy: Ethics. Elsevier. pp. 580--585.
Anthropocentrism in Climate Ethics and Policy.Katie McShane - 2016 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 40 (1):189-204.
The Precautionary Principle and the Dilemma Objection.Daniel Steel - 2013 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 16 (3):321-340.
Paralysis Lost.Paul J. Ford - 2001 - Social Theory and Practice 27 (4):661-680.
Poliomyelitis and Infantile Paralysis: Changes in Host and Virus.H. V. Wyatt - 1993 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 15 (3):357 - 396.
Risking Future Generations.Rahul Kumar - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (2):245-257.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-10

Downloads
9 (#1,253,837)

6 months
4 (#790,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Clare Alexandra Palmer
Texas A&M University
Bob Fischer
Texas State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references