Nietzsche and Unamuno on Conatus and the Agapeic Way of Life

Metaphilosophy 51 (2-3):303-317 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Unamuno saw in his defense of religious faith a response to Nietzsche’s criticisms of the Christian, agapeic way of life. To Nietzsche’s claim that engaging in this way of life is something antinatural and life-denying, insofar as it goes against the (alleged) natural tendency to increase one’s own power, Unamuno responded that an agapeic way of life is precisely a direct expression of this natural tendency. Far from being something that goes against our natural inclinations, Unamuno says, an agapeic way of life is a life-affirming exercise, something we are led to given our own natural condition. Hence, the aim of this essay is to comment on Unamuno’s criticism of Nietzsche and to point out the philosophical relevance of Unamuno’s attempt to provide a natural foundation for religious faith when assessing Nietzsche’s criticisms of the possibility of carrying out a Christian, agapeic way of life.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Relation Between Life, Conatus, and Virtue in Spinoza’s Philosophy.Sylvain Zac - 1996 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 19 (1):151-173.
The Relation of Conatus with spinoza`s Ethics.Muhammad Ali Abdllahi & Muhammad Gharibzade - 2017 - Metaphysics (University of Isfahan) 9 (23):69-82.
The tragic sense of life in men and nations.Miguel de Unamuno - 1972 - [Princeton, N.J.]: Princeton University Press. Edited by Anthony Kerrigan & Martin Nozick.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-28

Downloads
60 (#266,213)

6 months
15 (#163,632)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alberto Oya
Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Citations of this work

Unamuno and the Makropulos Debate.Alberto Oya - 2021 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 91 (2):111-114.

Add more citations