- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Ecological issues: A reply to Todd, Fiddick, & Krauss
Thinking and Reasoning 6 (4):385 – 388 (2000)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Actions and Character: A Reply to Todd Lekan.John Lachs - 1998 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (1):149 - 154.
Use or misuse of the selection task? Rejoinder to Fiddick, Cosmides, and Tooby.Dan Sperber - 2002 - Cognition 85 (3):277-290.
Ecological identity work in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and a case study.Jessica S. Hayes-Conroy & Robert M. Vanderbeck - 2005 - Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (3):309 – 329.
How Smart can simple heuristics be?Nick Chater - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):745-746.
Arbitrary arbitrariness: Reply to Segal.Todd Jones - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):310-314.
Some Comments on Philip S. Foner's "Why the United States Went to War with Spain".Tom Fiddick - 1968 - Science and Society 32 (3):323 - 327.
Ecological rationality and its contents.M. Todd, Laurence Fiddick & Stefan Krauss - 2000 - Thinking and Reasoning 6 (4):375 – 384.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
41 (#386,790)
6 months
4 (#778,909)
2009-01-28
Downloads
41 (#386,790)
6 months
4 (#778,909)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes.Aron K. Barbey & Steven A. Sloman - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):241-254.
Commentary/Elqayam & Evans: Subtracting “ought” from “is”.Natalie Gold, Andrew M. Colman & Briony D. Pulford - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5).
The natural frequency hypothesis and evolutionary arguments.Yuichi Amitani - 2015 - Mind and Society 15 (1):1-19.
The Frequency Hypothesis and Evolutionary Arguments.Yuichi Amitani - 2008 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 41 (1):79-94.
What is evaluative normativity, that we (maybe) should avoid it?Jonathan M. Weinberg - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):274-275.
References found in this work
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1974 - Science 185 (4157):1124-1131.
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Steven A. Sloman - 1996 - Psychological Bulletin 119 (1):3-22.
Rationality in reasoning: The problem of deductive competence.Jonathan Evans & David E. Over - unknown - Current Psychology of Cognition 16 (1-2):3-38.
How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.Gerd Gigerenzer & Ulrich Hoffrage - 1995 - Psychological Review 102 (4):684-704.
The Case for Rules in Reasoning.Edward E. Smith, Christopher Langston & Richard E. Nisbett - 1992 - Cognitive Science 16 (1):1-40.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo