Commentary/Elqayam & Evans: Subtracting “ought” from “is”

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5) (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Normative theories can be useful in developing descriptive theories, as when normative subjective expected utility theory is used to develop descriptive rational choice theory and behavioral game theory. “Ought” questions are also the essence of theories of moral reasoning, a domain of higher mental processing that could not survive without normative considerations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
3,080 (#3,604)

6 months
148 (#39,312)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Natalie Gold
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1983 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 260 references / Add more references