A defense of middle knowledge

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 21 (3):161 - 169 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

tionals, which means that he knows what actions would be necessary for him to perform in order to bring about a certain outcome. Because he is omnipotent, he can do whatever action is necessary to bring about a certain outcome that he desires. His benevolence implies that he will want to actualize the best possible world, or at least a world containing no evil. Given this scenario it is argued..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conditionals of Freedom as Bivalent: A Defense of Middle Knowledge.Dean Allan Kowalski - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
God and Toleration.Xunwu Chen - 2010 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 15 (2):335-353.
The immorality of prayer.Ardon Lyon - 2015 - Think 14 (40):57-64.
An Argument against Bernard Williams’ Account of Reason Internalism.Muhammad Heydarpour & Hosein Dabbagh - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 24 (1):21-42.
Swinburne on Natural Evil.David O'Connor - 1983 - Religious Studies 19 (1):65 - 73.
Freedom and Evil.Richard Swinburne - 2005 - In Julian Baggini & Jeremy Stangroom (eds.), What Philosophers Think. A&C Black.
A Craigian Theodicy of Hell.Charles Seymour - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):103-115.
What God Could Have Made.Michael Losonsky & Heimir Geirsson - 2005 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):355-376.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
90 (#185,817)

6 months
8 (#506,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Otte
University of California, Santa Cruz

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references