Why geophysics?

, &
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (3):253-257 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/s1355-2198(00)00021-6

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Why Geophysics?Naomi Oreskes & James R. Fleming - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (3):253-257.
Why geophysics?Naomi Oreskes & James R. Fleming - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (3):253-257.
The Assembly of Geophysics: Scientific Disciplines as Frameworks of Consensus.Gregory A. Good - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (3):259-292.
Why Be regular?, part I.Benjamin Feintzeig, J. B. Le Manchak, Sarita Rosenstock & James Owen Weatherall - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 65 (C):122-132.
Why be regular? Part II.Benjamin Feintzeig & James Owen Weatherall - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 65 (C):133-144.
Why the quantum?Jeffrey Bub - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2):241-266.
Review of R. Clifton, Quantum Entanglements. [REVIEW]Wayne C. Myrvold - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39:700-701.
Non-monotonic probability theory for n-state quantum systems.Fred Kronz - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (2):259-272.
Critical assembly: How (but not why) we got the bomb. [REVIEW]Mark Walker - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26 (1):117-120.
Editorial Board.[author unknown] - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 62:ii.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
18 (#829,194)

6 months
18 (#191,063)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Disunity of science: boundaries, contexts, and power.Peter Galison & David J. Stump (eds.) - 1996 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

Add more references