The differential effects of syntactical pairings on cued recall and recognition

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (3):232-233 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Encoding context effects in recognition and cued recall.Virginia A. Diehl & David L. Horton - 1988 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (5):393-394.
Expectancy and cued recall.Marion Quinn Lewis-Smith - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (2):145-147.
Cued serial recall.Dewey Rundus & John R. Furino - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (3):197-199.
Hypermnesia occurs in both free-recall and cued-recall tests.Dg Payne & Js Anastasi - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):522-522.
Response-set size effects in recall and recognition.May F. D’Amato & Agnes Marchese - 1984 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (6):503-506.
Stem completion versus cued-recall-the role of response bias.Em Reingold & Pm Merikle - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):521-521.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
12 (#1,094,846)

6 months
3 (#1,208,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Encoding specificity and integration of word pairs.Charles De Vito - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (3):215-216.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references