Effects of test expectancy on children’s recall and recognition

, &
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (5):425-428 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03329380

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Effects of familiarity on preschool children’s recall.Christine M. Todd & Marion Perlmutter - 1983 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (3):168-170.
Recognition test trials without distractors: A comparison of test trials and study trials on recognition and recall.William P. Wallace & Karen A. Page - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 20 (5):245-248.
Cueing and test time in free recall and recognition.Donald J. Lehr, Barbara F. Sloan & Kathleen J. Stiller - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (4):303-304.
Presentation-rate effects and age differences in children’s free recall.James W. Hall & Margaret B. Tinzmann - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (3):227-229.
Encoding context effects in recognition and cued recall.Virginia A. Diehl & David L. Horton - 1988 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (5):393-394.
Expectancy and cued recall.Marion Quinn Lewis-Smith - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (2):145-147.
Response-set size effects in recall and recognition.May F. D’Amato & Agnes Marchese - 1984 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (6):503-506.
The differential effects of syntactical pairings on cued recall and recognition.Andrew Manfred Olson - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (3):232-233.
The effects of instructions on recall and recognition of categorized lists by the elderly.Thomas D. Overcast, Martin D. Murphy, Sandra S. Smiley & Ann L. Brown - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (4):339-341.
Young children’s recognition as a function of the spacing of repetitions and the type of study and test stimuli.Allyson Cahill & Thomas C. Toppino - 1993 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (5):481-484.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
24 (#646,648)

6 months
6 (#700,858)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references