Biophilia and Biophobia as Emotional Attribution to Nature in Children of 5 Years Old

Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Introduction: Connectedness to nature is a concept that reflects the emotional relationship between the self and the natural environment, based on the theory of biophilia, the innate predisposition to the natural environment. However, the biophobic component has largely been ignored, despite, given its adaptive functional role, being an essential part of the construct. If there is a phylogenetic component underlying nature connectedness, biophilic and/or biophobic, there should be evidence of this record from early childhood. The main aim of this study is therefore to describe the emotional attributions identified in five-year-olds. Methodology: Two studies were conducted. In the first, 94 children expressed their concept of nature and made basic emotional attributions to a set of 60 images of natural and urban environments, using a software designed for the study. In the second, 39 children repeated the procedure and provided explanations for their responses. Results: The main results show that, in general, children use both positive and negative emotions, which may be related to a three-dimensional model of emotional attributions to nature. The most widely attributed emotion is happiness, for the images of both natural and built environments. However, fear is the second most common attribution. The role of happiness could be explained by a feeling of security and familiarity that the habitat of the built environment contributes to, while the importance of fear in nature could show an adaptive response of the fear of wild nature in children. This interpretation could be confirmed when analyzing specifically the emotional attributions to the natural environment, classifying the images according to biological and ecosystemic criteria. Thus, for example, more emotional attributions are explained by the "pleasantness" attributed to primary producers and landscapes (e.g. flora), versus attributions of "harm" to the images of secondary and tertiary consumers (e.g. hunters). Conclusions: These results provide evidence in favor of a didactic procedure to study emotional attributions to images of nature in preschool children. They suggest the incorporation of biophobia as an important adaptive factor in connectedness to nature and a tripartite emotional hypothesis based on the valences of the attributed emotions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biophilia as an Environmental Virtue.David Clowney - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (5):999-1014.
Seeing Agents When we Need to, Attributing Experience When we Feel Like it.Ida Hallgren - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (3):369-382.
Toward a general sociological theory of emotions.Jonathan H. Turner - 1999 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29 (2):133–161.
Simulation, co-cognition, and the attribution of emotional states.Bill Wringe - 2003 - European Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):353-374.
Revealing children's biophilia.G. Barbiero - 2009 - In Donald Gray, Laura Colucci-Gray & Elena Camino (eds.), Science, society, and sustainability: education and empowerment for an uncertain world. New York: Routledge. pp. 181--184.
Biophilia.Edward O. Wilson (ed.) - 2009 - Harvard University Press.
Let’s Talk About Emotions.Dina Mendonça - 2009 - Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children 19 (2-3):57-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-20

Downloads
44 (#359,839)

6 months
31 (#105,052)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?