A Corrective to the Ramsey-Lewis Account of Theoretical Terms

Analysis 54 (2):105 - 110 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is semantics in the plan?Peter Menzies & Huw Price - 2009 - In David Braddon-Mitchell & Robert Nola (eds.), Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 159--82.
An Empiricist Criterion of Meaning.Yann Benétreau-Dupin - 2011 - South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):95-108.
Scientific realism, Ramsey sentences and the reference of theoretical terms.Pierre Cruse - 2004 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (2 & 3):133 – 149.
On theoretical constructs and Ramsey constants.R. M. Martin - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):1-13.
Naturalising normativity.Mark Colyvan - 2009 - In David Braddon-Mitchell & Robert Nola (eds.), Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. MIT Press.
Ramsey's tests.B. H. Slater - 2004 - Synthese 141 (3):431-444.
Three Views of Theoretical Knowledge.William Demopoulos - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):177-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
103 (#165,954)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Truth, Ramsification, and the Pluralist's Revenge.Cory Wright - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):265–283.
Practical belief and philosophical theory.Philip Pettit - 1998 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (1):15 – 33.
Functionalism and tacit knowledge of grammar.David Balcarras - 2023 - Philosophical Perspectives 37 (1):18-48.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Putnam’s paradox.David Lewis - 1984 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (3):221 – 236.
Meaning and evidence: A reply to Lewis.John O'Leary-Hawthorne - 1993 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):206 – 211.

Add more references