- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
David Hull's evolutionary model for the progress and process of science
Biology and Philosophy 5 (4):473-487 (1990)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Epistemology or not? An inquiry into David Hull's evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science.Kai Hahlweg - 1988 - Biology and Philosophy 3 (2):187-192.
Scientific Pluralism and the Plurality of the Sciences: Comments on David Hull’s S cience as a Process.John Dupré - 1990 - Philosophical Studies 60 (1-2):61 - 76.
Groups on groups: Some dynamics and possible resolution of the units of selection debates in evolutionary biology. [REVIEW]Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):389-401.
Sociology, selection, and success: A critique of David Hull's analysis of science and systematics. [REVIEW]Michael J. Donoghue - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (4):459-472.
Selection and science: Critical notice of David Hull's science as a process. [REVIEW]Alex Rosenberg - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):217-228.
The Wider Domain of Evolutionary Thought. David Oldroyd, Ian Langham.Greta Jones - 1984 - Isis 75 (3):586-587.
Adaptation in evolutionary epistemology: Clarifying Hull's model. [REVIEW]Alan G. Gross - 1988 - Biology and Philosophy 3 (2):185-186.
Revisiting Hull's Evolutionary Model of Science.Mohammad Mahdi Hatef - 2021 - Balkan Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):145-152.
The evolutionary structure of scientific theories.John S. Wilkins - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (4):479–504.
Evolutionary epistemology, social epistemology, and the demic structure of science.Todd A. Grantham - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):443-463.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
48 (#371,656)
6 months
2 (#1,697,026)
2009-01-28
Downloads
48 (#371,656)
6 months
2 (#1,697,026)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Evolutionary epistemology, social epistemology, and the demic structure of science.Todd A. Grantham - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):443-463.
Methodological problems in evolutionary biology. XIII. Evolution and knowledge.Wim J. van der Steen - 2000 - Acta Biotheoretica 48 (1):73-84.
References found in this work
Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society.Bruno Latour - 1987 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The Theory of Moral Sentiments.Adam Smith - 1759 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya.
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary B. Hesse - 1963 - [Notre Dame, Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press.
Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science.David L. Hull - 1988 - University of Chicago Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5d8df9484f-rkp68 uwo