Narrations on the Sufyānī Revealed by Political and Sectarian Events

Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi 24 (3):1135-1156 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Sufyānī narration, which is also referred in some studies carried out today, is mentioned in the early Shiite and Sunnī sources. The anticipated savior perception of the period has an important place in understanding the Sufyānī narrations in the emergence process of which political and sectarian events were effective. Narrations stating that the Mahdī named Muḥammad, one of the descendants of the Prophet Muḥammad (pbuh), would appear in the end of times and establish justice by bringing order to the world where oppression, injustice and inequity have spread, were effective in the political and social life after the Prophet (pbuh). The emergence of the Sufyānī narrations, whose intellectual infrastructure was constituted by the expected Mahdī perception that is effective in the society, was the result of the political conflicts of the period. The death of Muʻāwiya ibn Yazīd (d. 64/684), the third Caliph of the Umayyad State, without leaving a crown behind caused a political crisis. The cousin of the Muʻāwiya II, Marwān bin al-Ḥakam, the experienced politician who turned this moment of crisis into an opportunity and who was from the same dynasty but from a different family, took over the administration and thus the sultanate continued. Although the reign continued from the sons of Umayyad, the administration passed from sons of Sufyān to the sons of Marwān, who were from the same dynasty. This situation caused discomfort in Sufyānīs. Thus, Muʻāwiya II's brother Khālid ibn Yazīd, whose right of administration was seized from him, with the intention of gaining his lost reputation in the society and turning the pessimism towards his family into hope and desire, has been claimed to spread the savior Sufyānī narrations expected from the sons of Sufyān, parallel to the Mahdī narrations expected from the sons of Alī, which was influential in the society. Thus, the Sufyānī came to be expected like the expected Mahdī, who was influential in society and exploited by the Shiite sects in their own belief systems. The rebellions carried out by the sons of Sufyān against the administration in the 2nd century hijrī and afterwards were conceived as the appearance of the Sufyānī expected by the society and the person who led the rebellion was described as Sufyānī. The most important of these rebellions is the revolt of ʻAlī ibn Abdullah ibn Khālid nicknamed Abū ʻAmayṭar, formed by the coalition of sons of ʻAlī and sons of Sufyān who descend from the sons of Umayya. Abū ʻAmayṭar, who is considered to be the Sufyānī and some sections of whose life constitute a source for many narrations on the Sufyānī, declared his caliphate during the period of Abbasī Caliph al-Amīn (d. 198/813) and called for allegiance to himself. The announcement of his caliphate was considered by his supporters as the expected savior. The period of Abū ʻAmayṭar and the sayings about him are extremely important in terms of presenting the expected savior perception in the society, the Sufyānī understanding and the date of his emergence. Sections from Abū ʻAmayṭar's life reflected in the narrations about the Sufyānī in many Shiite and Sunnī sources. In this article, it is tried to examine the emergence of the Sufyānī narrations, its development and particularly its transformation within the Shiite sect, in a detailed manner and especially based on political and sectarian events of the early period.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Endülüs'te Gaz'lî Algısı.Birgül Bozkurt - 2017 - Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):245-309.
Eski Mezopotamya'da Siyasi Örgütlenmede.Yusuf Kiliç - 2013 - Journal of Turkish Studies 8 (Volume 8 Issue 5):387-403.
Tıp Etiğinden Bio-Etiğe: Fritz Jahr.Haluk Aşar - 2019 - Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / Cilicia Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):42-56.
İbn Tûmert’in Mezhebî Kimliği.Abdullah Yavuz - 2017 - Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi 21 (3):2069-2101.
Türkçe ve Özbekçede Nezaket Anlatan Paralinguistik Olayların Mukayes.Holida İmamova - 2016 - Journal of Turkish Studies 11 (Volume 11 Issue 10):333-333.
Kant’ın Felsefesinde Ebedi Barış Düşüncesinin Güncelliği Üzerine.Yıldız Karagöz Yeke - 2016 - Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):141-175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-17

Downloads
10 (#1,187,905)

6 months
4 (#775,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references