Are psychologists appraising research properly? Some Popperian notes regarding replication failures in psychology

Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 41 (4):233-247 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

News And Notes.Amy Smith - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (4):264-265.
Popperian or not: Replicable observations still matter.David Trafimow - 2020 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 40 (2):124-126.
News and notes.Amy Smith - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (2):136-137.
Getting ontologically serious about the replication crisis in psychology.José E. Burgos - forthcoming - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology.
News and notes.Amy Fisher Smith - 2013 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 33 (3):203-203.
The replication crisis: How might philosophy and theory of psychology be of use?Jill Morawski - 2019 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 39 (4):218-238.
Against the resampling account of replication.Vera Matarese - 2023 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 43 (2):108-115.
Replication and reform: Vagaries of a social movement.James Walkup - 2021 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 41 (2):131-133.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-24

Downloads
38 (#408,550)

6 months
10 (#383,634)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references