Is the difference between gill and girl more than a letter?
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (1):7-10 (1986)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Becoming-Rhythm: A Rhizomatics of the Girl.Leisha Jones - 2011 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 5 (3):383-399.
Making space: separatism and difference.Gill Valentine - 1997 - In John Paul Jones, Heidi J. Nast & Susan M. Roberts (eds.), Thresholds in Feminist Geography: Difference, Methodology, and Representation. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 65--76.
An Unpublished Letter of Germanus, Patriarch of Constantinople.J. Gill - 1974 - Byzantion 44:142-51.
Share a SplifF, Share a Girl—Same Difference: The Unpleasant Reality of Gang Rape.Rose George - 2005 - In Nicholas Bamforth (ed.), Sex Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 2002. Oxford University Press. pp. 166.
Marcus Herz: First letter (1770) / Herz ; Second letter (1771) / Kant ; Third letter (1771) / Herz ; Observations from speculative philosophy (1771) / Herz ; Fourth letter (1772) ; Fifth letter (1776). [REVIEW] Kant - 2009 - In Eric Watkins (ed.), Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials. Cambridge University Press.
Mapping in the realm of polyploidy: The wheat model.Kulvinder S. Gill & Bikram S. Gill - 1994 - Bioessays 16 (11):841-846.
Fantastick Associations and Addictive General Rules: A Fundamental Difference between Hutcheson and Hume.Michael B. Gill - 1996 - Hume Studies 22 (1):23-48.
Objectivism and subjectivism in the foundations of statistics.Domenico Costantini - 1989 - Erkenntnis 31 (2-3):387 - 396.
Why is the bishops' letter on the U.s. Economy so unconvincing?William S. Reece - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7):553 - 560.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-22
Downloads
10 (#889,494)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
2014-01-22
Downloads
10 (#889,494)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Integration of featural information in speech perception.Gregg C. Oden & Dominic W. Massaro - 1978 - Psychological Review 85 (3):172-191.
