Why is the bishops' letter on the U.s. Economy so unconvincing?

Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7):553 - 560 (1989)

Abstract

This paper evaluates the rhetoric of the U.S. bishops' pastoral letter on the U.S. economy from two perspectives. Is the letter convincing? Does it conform to the conversational norms of civilization? The paper argues that the bishops' letter fails by both standards because it ignores serious research on the U.S. economy, it misstates important facts about the economy, and it sneers at professional economists. The paper concludes that the bishops' letter will not be convincing to well informed readers.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,694

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
12 (#815,904)

6 months
1 (#388,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Mortal Questions.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
The Wealth of Nations.Adam Smith - 1976 - Hackett Publishing Company.
The Rise of Scientific Philosophy.Hans Reichenbach - 1951 - Berkeley: University of California Press.
A Rhetoric of Motives.Kenneth Burke - 1950 - Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mortal Questions.Thomas Nagel - 1980 - Critica 12 (34):125-133.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations