Eroticizing Marx, Revolutionizing Freud: Marcuse’s Psychoanalytic Turn

Kritike 3 (1):10-23 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The conclusion arrived at in the article titled “Heidegger, Hegel, Marx: Marcuse and the Theory of Historicity,” which appeared in a previous issue of this journal, accounts for Herbert Marcuse’s view of the possibility of the individual to become disposed to radical action. Marcuse thus wants to suggest that there is still hope for the Enlightenment’s project of “emancipation,” and that there is still a revolutionary subject who can carry out this political struggle for liberation. The progression of consciousness which results in a historically conscious individual exemplified by the “consciousslave” in Hegel’s discussion of master-slave relation provided Marcuse the basis of his claim that the individual can be an active and dynamic political subject. Yet the slave who realizes via the notion of labor that it is himself and not the master who is truly free is, after all, still a slave. This means that individuals still need to fight for their freedom.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
36 (#431,390)

6 months
6 (#701,066)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffry Ocay
Eastern Visayas State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Dialectic of Eros and Freedom: Beauvoir and Marcuse.Cynthia Willet - 2002 - In Kelly Oliver & Steve Edwin (eds.), Between the psyche and the social: psychoanalytic social theory. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 203.

Add more references