Discussion. Deconstructing protocols: Reply to Uebel

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):301-304 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deconstructing Protocols: Reply to Uebel.Thomas Oberdan - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):301 - 304.
Protocols, Affirmations, and Foundations: Reply to Oberdan.Thomas E. Uebel - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):297 - 300.
Discussion. Protocols, affirmations, and foundations: Reply to Oberdan.T. E. Uebel - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):297-300.
Discussion. Reply to grünbaum.Richard Swinburne - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):481-485.
Reply to David Harrah's discussion note.W. B. Gallie - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):239-240.
Behaviour therapy: A reply to an incautious discussion.Edward Erwin - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (1):53-60.
Discussion. In defence of the Baldwin effect: a reply to Watkins.John Dupré - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):477-479.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
74 (#217,672)

6 months
10 (#384,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Oberdan
Clemson University

Citations of this work

Carnap e o revisionismo.Gelson Liston - 2012 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 16 (1):99-119.

Add more citations