Journal of Critical Realism 11 (1):76-93 (2012)
AbstractThis essay argues that critical realism provides a philosophical perspective from which to talk about good and evil. It draws on dialectical critical realism’s meta-ethics of freedom and solidarity, and the different grades of freedom identified there: from the basic spontaneity in agency to the possibility of a fully flourishing, eudaimonic social condition. It argues that evil acts can be understood as those which fundamentally deny basic human freedom (spontaneity) and solidarity, and that good acts are those which affirm human flourishing and solidarity. It draws upon Hannah Arendt’s depiction of what was morally evil in the Holocaust, and recent English criminal trials involving mercy killing to depict the good. It suggests that moral framing in terms of good and evil lies beyond the terms in which modern law thinks of human actions
Similar books and articles
Good and Evil Actions: A Journey Through Saint Thomas Aquinas.Steven J. Jensen - 2010 - Catholic University of America Press.
Is All Evil Really Only Privation?John F. Crosby - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:197-209.
What is so good about moral freedom?Wes Morriston - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (200):344-358.
Human Freedom and the Logic of Evil: Prolegomenon to a Christian Theology of Evil.Richard Worsley - 1996 - St. Martin's Press.
Freedom and Evil.Richard Swinburne - 2003 - In Julian Baggini & Jeremy Stangroom (eds.), What Philosophers Think. Continuum Press.
Mis/Representing Evil: Evil in an Interdisciplinary Key.Charlene P. E. Burns (ed.) - 2009 - Inter-Disciplinary Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Realism, dialectic, justice and law: an interview with Alan Norrie.Alan Norrie & Jamie Morgan - 2021 - Journal of Critical Realism 20 (1):98-122.
References found in this work
Dialectic and Difference: Dialectical Critical Realism and the Grounds of Justice.Alan William Norrie - 2009 - Routledge.