- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
More why, less how: What we need from models of cognition
Cognition 213 (C):104688 (2021)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Toward mechanistic models of action-oriented and detached cognition.Giovanni Pezzulo - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.
Models for cognition and emotion: Evolutionary and linguistic considerations.Carlos Montemayor - 2015 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38.
The bounds of representation: A non-representationalist use of the resources of the model of extended cognition.Pierre Steiner - 2010 - Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (2):235-272.
Commentary on “Interaction in Spoken Word Recognition Models”.Dennis Norris, James M. McQueen & Anne Cutler - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Integrating models of cognition and culture will require a bit more math.Matthew R. Zefferman & Paul E. Smaldino - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.
Interaction with autonomy: Multiple Output models and the inadequacy of the Great Divide.Julie E. Boland & Anne Cutler - 1996 - Cognition 58 (3):309-320.
Race models and analogy theories: A dead heat? Reply to Seidenberg.Dennis Norris & Gordon Brown - 1985 - Cognition 20 (2):155-168.
Evaluating Artificial Models of Cognition.Marcin Miłkowski - 2015 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 40 (1):43-62.
The bounds of representation: A non-representationalist use of the resources of the model of extended cognition.Pierre Steiner - 2010 - Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (2):235-272.
Bridging the gap: Dynamics as a unified view of cognition.Derek Harter, Arthur C. Graesser & Stan Franklin - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):45-46.
A comparison of different cognitive paradigms using simple animats in a virtual laboratory, with implications to the notion of cognition.Carlos Gershenson - 2002
Dynamical models of cognition.Marco Giunti - 1995 - In T. Van Gelder & Robert Port (eds.), Mind As Motion. MIT Press. pp. 549-571.
Reading semantic cognition as a theory of concepts.Jesse Snedeker - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):727-728.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-03-27
Downloads
8 (#1,291,989)
6 months
3 (#1,002,413)
2021-03-27
Downloads
8 (#1,291,989)
6 months
3 (#1,002,413)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
References found in this work
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects.Chaz Firestone & Brian J. Scholl - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:1-72.
Word learning as Bayesian inference.Fei Xu & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (2):245-272.
The temporal structure of spoken language understanding.William Marslen-Wilson & Lorraine Komisarjevsky Tyler - 1980 - Cognition 8 (1):1-71.
Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.Stephen D. Goldinger - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (2):251-279.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo