- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
More why, less how: What we need from models of cognition
Cognition 213 (C):104688 (2021)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The human stain: Why cognitivism can't tell us what cognition is & what it does. Lyon, P. & Keijzer, F. A. - unknown
A cognitive-emotional model of NSSI: using emotion regulation and cognitive processes to explain why people self-injure.Penelope Hasking, Janis Whitlock, David Voon & Alyssa Rose - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (8):1543-1556.
Why not model spoken word recognition instead of phoneme monitoring?Jean Vroomen & Beatrice de Gelder - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):349-350.
Ecological-enactive scientific cognition: modeling and material engagement.Giovanni Rolla & Felipe Novaes - 2020 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1:1-19.
Integrating models of cognition and culture will require a bit more math.Matthew R. Zefferman & Paul E. Smaldino - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.
When and how less is more: reply to Tharp and Pickering.Marci S. DeCaro, Krista D. Carlson, Robin D. Thomas & Sian L. Beilock - 2009 - Cognition 111 (3):415-421.
Not all neighborhood effects are created equal.Rochelle S. Newman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):343-343.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-03-27
Downloads
21 (#1,065,849)
6 months
6 (#625,909)
2021-03-27
Downloads
21 (#1,065,849)
6 months
6 (#625,909)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Contra assertions, feedback improves word recognition: How feedback and lateral inhibition sharpen signals over noise.James S. Magnuson, Anne Marie Crinnion, Sahil Luthra, Phoebe Gaston & Samantha Grubb - 2024 - Cognition 242 (C):105661.
Why might there be lexical-prelexical feedback in speech recognition?Dennis Norris & James M. McQueen - 2025 - Cognition 255 (C):106025.
References found in this work
Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects.Chaz Firestone & Brian Scholl - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:1-72.
Word learning as Bayesian inference.Fei Xu & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (2):245-272.
Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.Stephen D. Goldinger - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (2):251-279.
The temporal structure of spoken language understanding.William Marslen-Wilson & Lorraine Komisarjevsky Tyler - 1980 - Cognition 8 (1):1-71.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-9qhf6 uwo