Dialogue 42 (3):499-530 (
2003)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
Throughout the 1920s Heidegger's answer to the question of how to conceive of the phenomenon as a phenomenon has been the “formal indication,” that is a non-subsuming, non-generalizing type of discourse. Through a detailed interpretation of the sporadic explanations he gives on the matter, I try to point out some of the inconsistencies in his conception, and then work them out. I try to show in particular how Heidegger's emphasis on the method of phenomenology, which expresses his unrelenting desire to let the phenomenon be seen in itself, led him to overlook the essential role of language in phenomenological analysis.