Democracy and legitimacy in plurinational societies

Contemporary Political Theory 8 (3):276-294 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper's aim is to tackle some significant challenges faced by democratic theory in plurinational societies. Claims to recognition challenge the assumption of a ‘people speaking in one voice’ and therefore, some basic tenets of liberal democracy. In a context where one cannot assume anymore a homogeneous demos, it is tempting to believe that there may be an independent, yet democratic, principle that may help us to solve the problem of the ‘constitution of the demos.’ Goodin argues that the all-affected interests principle is in fact the best principle of inclusion in democratic decision-making. Yet I argue that the all-affected interests principle is not really useful, at least as a starting point. But if this is so, and if the picture underlying modern democratic theory is seriously undermined by claims to recognition, how are the communities to which self-rule necessarily relates to be bounded?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How do affected interests support global democracy?Vuko Andrić - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (3):264-278.
On the Demos and its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem.Arash Abizadeh - 2012 - American Political Science Review 106 (4):867-882.
Economic Participation Rights and the All-Affected Principle.Annette Zimmermann - 2017 - Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 10 (2):1-21.
Economic Participation Rights and the All-Affected Principle.Annette Zimmermann - 2018 - Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 10 (2).
The boundary problem of democracy: A function-sensitive view.Eva Erman - 2022 - Contemporary Political Theory 21 (2):240-261.
Defining the demos.Ben Saunders - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):280-301.
The Case for Democratic Patients: Epistemic Democracy Goes Green.Andrés Cruz - 2018 - Ethic@: An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 17 (3):423–444.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
30 (#519,559)

6 months
21 (#166,095)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Enfranchising all affected interests, and its alternatives.Robert E. Goodin - 2007 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (1):40–68.
Popular Sovereignty and Nationalism.Bernard Yack - 2001 - Political Theory 29 (4):517-536.
Give and take: Arendt and the nomos of political community.Hans Lindahl - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (7):881-901.
The real world of (global) democracy.Daniel M. Weinstock - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (1):6–20.

View all 10 references / Add more references