Constituting the polity, constituting the demos: on the place of the all affected interests principle in democratic theory and in resolving the democratic boundary problem

Ethics and Global Politics 5 (3):129-152 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay considers the role of the ‘all affected interests’ principle in democratic theory, focusing on debates concerning its form, substance and relationship to the resolution of the democratic boundary problem. It begins by defending an ‘all actually affected’ formulation of the principle against Goodin’s ‘incoherence argument’ critique of this formulation, before addressing issues concerning how to specify the choice set appropriate to the principle. Turning to the substance of the principle, the argument rejects Nozick’s dismissal of its intuitive appeal and considers the two arguments advanced in favour of the principle as a criterion of democratic inclusion: the interlinked interests argument and the tracking power argument. It is shown that neither of these arguments can substantiate a view of the principle as a criterion of democratic inclusion, although both ground a constitutional understanding of the principle as specifying the scope of a duty of justification. It is then proposed that the principle can play an important role in a two-stage resolution of the democratic boundary problem in which it addresses the question of who is entitled to inclusion in the ‘pre-political’ demos that determines whether to constitute a polity. The second stage of this resolution requires an answer to the question of who should constitute the ‘political demos’, that is, the demos of a constituted polity and it is argued that a version of the ‘‘all subjected persons’’ principle can appropriately play this role.Keywords: all affected interests; all subjected persons; democracy; boundary problem; demos problem.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Democracy and legitimacy in plurinational societies.Genevieve Nootens - 2009 - Contemporary Political Theory 8 (3):276-294.
On the Demos and its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem.Arash Abizadeh - 2012 - American Political Science Review 106 (4):867-882.
Defining the demos.Ben Saunders - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):280-301.
Democratic Theory and Border Coercion.Arash Abizadeh - 2008 - Political Theory 36 (1):37-65.
Transnational citizenship and the democratic state: modes of membership and voting rights.David Owen - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):641-663.
Sharing democracy.Michaele L. Ferguson - 2012 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Democratic inclusion, law, and causes.Ludvig Beckman - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (3):348-364.
Problems in the Theory of Democratic Authority.Christopher S. King - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):431 - 448.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-13

Downloads
109 (#149,647)

6 months
11 (#128,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Owen
University of Southampton

Citations of this work

The boundary problem of democracy: A function-sensitive view.Eva Erman - 2022 - Contemporary Political Theory 21 (2):240-261.
Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem.David Miller - 2020 - Philosophy Compass 15 (11):1-9.
Political rights, republican freedom, and temporary workers.Alex Sager - 2014 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (2):189-211.

View all 42 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references