The Ancient versus the Modern Continuum

Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 73 (3-4):1343-1380 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We discuss the differences between the ancient and the modern notion of mathematical continuity. We focus on three ancient approaches to the continuum, namely the monist, the atomist and the Aristotelian approach. Afterwards, we analyze the construction of real numbers by Dedekind, Weierstrass and Cantor. The modern continuum is characterized by these constructions, but is a more general notion. We compare the ancient conception of continuity and the modern approach in order to show that the modern concept of mathematical continuity cannot be interpreted as part of the ancient theoretical framework, or as some kind of extension of this framework.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On two consequences of CH established by Sierpiński.R. Pol & P. Zakrzewski - forthcoming - Archive for Mathematical Logic:1-15.
Infinitesimals as an issue of neo-Kantian philosophy of science.Thomas Mormann & Mikhail Katz - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science (2):236-280.
Dedekind on continuity.Emmylou Haffner & Dirk Schlimm - 2020 - In Stewart Shapiro & Geoffrey Hellman (eds.), The History of Continua: Philosophical and Mathematical Perspectives. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 255–282.
Nicole Oresme on Motion and the Atomization of the Continuum.Philippe Debroise - 2022 - Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 29 (1):113-155.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-19

Downloads
16 (#935,433)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references