Müller's conclusions and linguistic research

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):641-642 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Because Müiller fails to distinguish between two senses of the term “autonomy,” there is a danger that his results will be misinterpreted by both linguists and neuroscientists. Although he may very well have been successful in refuting one sense of autonomy, he may actually have helped to provide an explanation for the correctness of autonomy in its other sense.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autonomy and the Demands of Love.Mark Piper - 2015 - IAFOR Journal of Ethics, Religion and Philosophy 2 (1):30–39.
Autonomy and Its Discontents.Marilyn Friedman - 2003 - In Autonomy, gender, politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Autonomy and Feminism.Andrew Wayne Schwartz - 2003 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
An aristotelian account of autonomy.Peter Allmark - 2008 - Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (1):41-53.
Making a Difference.Pamela Hieronymi - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (1):81-94.
Autonomy and Pluralism.Joseph Raz - 1986 - In The Morality of Freedom. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
21 (#727,311)

6 months
5 (#836,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
Aspects of the Theory of Syntax.Noam Chomsky - 1965 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Metaphors we live by.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Mark Johnson.

View all 121 references / Add more references