- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The anhedonia hypothesis of neuroleptic drug action: Basic and clinical considerations
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):70-71 (1982)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Neuroleptic-induced anhedonia: Some psychopharmacological implications.Philippe Soubrie - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):76-77.
On the generality of the anhedonia hypothesis.N. W. Milgram - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):69-69.
The anhedonia vs the eclectic hypothesis.William Lyons - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):65-66.
The anhedonia hypothesis for neuroleptics and operant behaviour.T. J. Crow - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):174-174.
The anhedonia hypothesis: Termites in the basement.Roger L. Mellgren - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):67-68.
The anhedonia hypothesis: Mark III.Roy A. Wise - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):178-186.
The dopamine anhedonia hypothesis: A pharmacological phrenology.George F. Koob - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):63-64.
Problems of concept and vocabulary in the anhedonia hypothesis.Darryl Neill - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):70-70.
Hypotheses of neuroleptic action: Levels of progress.Roy A. Wise - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):78-87.
Neuroleptics and operant behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis.Roy A. Wise - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):39-53.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
16 (#934,061)
6 months
6 (#588,740)
2014-01-20
Downloads
16 (#934,061)
6 months
6 (#588,740)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The anhedonia hypothesis for neuroleptics and operant behaviour.T. J. Crow - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):174-174.
Neuroleptic drugs may attenuate pleasure in the operant chamber, but in the schizophrenic's head they may simply reduce motivational arousal.Conan Kornetsky - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):176-177.
The role of arousal in hedonic evaluations.Ewa Kostarczyk - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):177-178.
Brain stimulation and catecholaminergic drugs: A focus on self-selected response durations versus interresponse intervals.Timothy Schallert - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):178-178.
References found in this work
A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.N. J. Mackintosh - 1975 - Psychological Review 82 (4):276-298.
Toward a general psychobiological theory of emotions.Jaak Panksepp - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (3):407-422.
Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning.Robert C. Bolles - 1972 - Psychological Review 79 (5):394-409.
Reticulo-cortical activity and behavior: A critique of the arousal theory and a new synthesis.C. H. Vanderwolf & T. E. Robinson - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):459-476.
Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention.Karl H. Pribram & Diane McGuinness - 1975 - Psychological Review 82 (2):116-149.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-hhxx8 uwo