Utilitarianism, Institutions, and Justice

Philosophical Review 109 (1):135 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Utilitarianism is subject to objections of at least three kinds: It is wrong about the nature of the fundamental property in virtue of which wrong acts are wrong. It is self-defeating in the sense that acting as it requires will actually undermine the goal of maximization. The acts it requires are, intuitively, wrong. In the book under review, Bailey replies to objections of all three kinds, but especially to the third.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Utilitarianism, institutions, and justice.James Wood Bailey - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Utilitarianism, institutions, and justice.William Nelson - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (1):135-138.
Classical utilitarianism.John Rawls - 1988 - In Samuel Scheffler (ed.), Consequentialism and its critics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Theorizing Justice: Critical Insights and Future Directions.Krushil Watene & Jay Drydyk (eds.) - 2016 - New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Utilitarianism and the Theory of Justice.Charles Blackorby, Walter Bossert & D. Donaldson - 1999 - School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
Sidgwick's Ethical Maxims.A. R. Lacey - 1959 - Philosophy 34 (130):217 - 228.
Distributive Justice and Welfarism in Utilitarianism.Jörg Schroth - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):123-146.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-07

Downloads
47 (#338,466)

6 months
14 (#179,586)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Classifying theories of welfare.Christopher Woodard - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):787-803.
Economic inequality and the long-term future.Andreas T. Schmidt & Daan Juijn - 2024 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 23 (1):67-99.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references