The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Moral Argument

Religious Studies 32 (1):15-26 (1996)


The Clarke/Rowe version of the Cosmological Argument is sound only if the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) is true, but many philosophers, including Rowe, think that there is not adequate evidence for the principle of sufficient reason. I argue that there may be indirect evidence for PSR on the grounds that if we do not accept it, we lose our best justification for an important principle of metaethics, namely, the Principle of Universalizability. To show this, I argue that all the other justifications of the Principle of Universalizability on offer, including Richard Hare's, are inadequate

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,855

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

238 (#48,500)

6 months
2 (#257,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark T. Nelson
Westmont College

References found in this work

Principia Ethica.George Edward Moore - 1903 - Dover Publications.
Freedom and Reason.Richard Mervyn Hare - 1963 - Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point.R. M. Hare (ed.) - 1981 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On ‘a New Cosmological Argument’.Graham Oppy - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (3):345-353.
Principle of Sufficient Reason.Yitzhak Melamed & Martin Lin - unknown - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
PSR.Michael Della Rocca - 2010 - Philosophers' Imprint 10.
On the Principle of Sufficient Reason.Jacek Wojtysiak - 2007 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):111-135.