Clarity is Not Enough [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 17 (3):485-485 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A collection of 19 essays by 16 philosophers critical of the merits of linguistic analysis. Everything has appeared previously. The editor's hope is to provide samples of criticism which might "create a somewhat less one-sided impression of the course of recent philosophy than prevails in many quarters at present." The essays settle, roughly, around two themes: the worth of appeals to ordinary language, and consequences for problems in the philosophy of mind. Contributors include Broad, Blanshard, Quine, Kneale, Black, Campbell, Findlay, Hampshire, Ayer.--N. S. C.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How should philosophy be clear? Loaded clarity, default clarity, and Adorno.Nicholas Joll - 2009 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2009 (146):73–95.
Clarity and the grammar of skepticism.Chris Barker - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (3):253-273.
Is Clarity Essential to Good Teaching?Mason Marshall & Aaron M. Clark - 2010 - Teaching Philosophy 33 (3):271-289.
Bridging the Gap.J. Harvey - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (2):151-159.
Clear as Mud.Dawn M. Phillips - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:277-294.
Localist representations and theoretical clarity.Norman D. Cook - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):474-475.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
38 (#412,027)

6 months
4 (#793,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references