Synthese 179 (3):455-477 (2011)

Bence Nanay
University of Antwerp
According to a once influential view of selection, it consists of repeated cycles of replication and interaction. It has been argued that this view is wrong: replication is not necessary for evolution by natural selection. I analyze the nine most influential arguments for this claim and defend the replication–interaction conception of selection against these objections. In order to do so, however, the replication–interaction conception of selection needs to be modified significantly. My proposal is that replication is not the copying of an entity, the replicator, but the copying of a property. Thus, we can have a replication process without there being a replicator that is being copied.
Keywords Replication  Interaction  Fitness  Replicators  Clonal organisms  Microbes
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-009-9702-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 91 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Units and Levels of Selection.Elisabeth Lloyd - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Popper's Darwinian Analogy.Bence Nanay - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (3):337-354.
The Evolution of Ecosystem Phenotypes.Sébastien Ibanez - 2020 - Biological Theory 15 (2):91-106.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
164 ( #70,462 of 2,499,059 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #36,182 of 2,499,059 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes