Replication, replication and replication: Some hard lessons from model alignment

Abstract

A published simulation model Riolo et al. 2001 ) was replicated in two independent implementations so that the results as well as the conceptual design align. This double replication allowed the original to be analysed and critiqued with confidence. In this case, the replication revealed some weaknesses in the original model, which otherwise might not have come to light. This shows that unreplicated simulation models and their results can not be trusted - as with other kinds of experiment, simulations need to be independently replicated.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Replication and mere replication.Michael Mulkay & G. Nigel Gilbert - 1986 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16 (1):21-37.
The causal crux of selection.Robert Alan Skipper - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):556-556.
The role of information and replication in selection processes.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):538-538.
Selection and the unification of science.Jay N. Eacker - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):535-536.
Multiply concurrent replication.David L. Hull & Sigrid S. Glenn - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):902-904.
Replication without replicators.Bence Nanay - 2011 - Synthese 179 (3):455-477.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#431,398)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?