Group Selection and our Obsession with the Meaning of Life

The Monist 93 (1):76-95 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to make an unlikely connection between the old question about the meaning of life and some important concepts in philosophy of biology. More precisely, I argue that while biology is unlikely to help us to figure out the meaning of life, the fact that this question has been considered to be such a crucial one could be explained with the help of some consideration of our evolutionary past. I argue that if there is evidence for group selection in the course of human evolution, this may explain not the meaning of life but rather the reason why we are preoccupied with this question. First, I examine what group selection is and what role it played in human evolution. After surveying the evidence for the claim that in the course of human evolution we lived in isolated group societies, I analyse what influence this social structure had on our present psychological dispositions, including our quest for the meaning of life.

Similar books and articles

Teleology and the Meaning of Life.Osamu Kiritani - 2012 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 33 (1-2):97-102.
Evolution and Existentialism.Sharon M. Kaye - 2014 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 22 (2):159-171.
Agreement and Sympathy: On Metz’s Meaning in Life.Sho Yamaguchi - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy of Life 5 (3): 66-89.
Understanding life: Recent work in philosophy of biology.Kim Sterelny - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (2):155-183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
389 (#54,382)

6 months
79 (#67,273)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bence Nanay
University of Antwerp

Citations of this work

Teleology and the Meaning of Life.Osamu Kiritani - 2012 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 33 (1-2):97-102.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references