Response to commentaries on “patient autonomy for the management of chronic conditions: A two-component re-conceptualization”

American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):W3 – W5 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The clinical application of the concept of patient autonomy has centered on the ability to deliberate and make treatment decisions to the virtual exclusion of the capacity to execute the treatment plan. However, the one-component concept of autonomy is problematic in the context of multiple chronic conditions. Adherence to complex treatments commonly breaks down when patients have functional, educational, and cognitive barriers that impair their capacity to plan, sequence, and carry out tasks associated with chronic care. The purpose of this article is to call for a two-component re-conceptualization of autonomy and to argue that the clinical assessment of capacity for patients with chronic conditions should be expanded to include both autonomous decision-making and autonomous execution of the agreed-upon treatment plan. We explain how the concept of autonomy should be expanded to include both decisional and executive autonomy, describe the biopsychosocial correlates of the two-component concept of autonomy, and recommend diagnostic and treatment strategies to support patients with deficits in executive autonomy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Managing one's body using self-management techniques: Practicing autonomy.Dick Willems - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):23-38.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-01

Downloads
27 (#587,064)

6 months
7 (#421,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laurence McCullough
Baylor College of Medicine