Lucretius I: an ontology of motion

Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Most Original and Shocking Interpretation of Lucretius in the Last Forty Years, After centuries of abuse by modern atomists and mechanistic materialists, Thomas Nail argues that it is now time to return to De Rerum Natura from the perspective of a new materialism. Nail shows that some of the most important contributions of Lucretius' poem have been completely overlooked or misunderstood. He reinterprets this classical text as an absolutely contemporary one defined by motion and gives us a genuinely new Lucretius - a Lucretius for today. Book jacket.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lucretius and the history of science.Monte Johnson & Catherine Wilson - 2007 - In Stuart Gillespie & Philip R. Hardie (eds.), The Cambridge companion to Lucretius. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lucretius and the Language of Nature.Barnaby Taylor - 2020 - Oxford University Press.
The Original Plan of Lucretius' De Rerum Natura.G. B. Townend - 1979 - Classical Quarterly 29 (01):101-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-07

Downloads
9 (#1,270,032)

6 months
6 (#700,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Nail
University of Denver

Citations of this work

Lucretius' arguments on the swerve and free-action.Basil Evangelidis - 2019 - Landmarks in the Philosophy, Ethics and History of Science.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references