Reliability connections between conceivability and inconceivability

Dialectica 60 (2):195-205 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Conceivability is an important source of our beliefs about what is possible; inconceivability is an important source of our beliefs about what is impossible. What are the connections between the reliability of these sources? If one is reliable, does it follow that the other is also reliable? The central contention of this paper is that suitably qualified the reliability of inconceivability implies the reliability of conceivability, but the reliability of conceivability fails to imply the reliability of inconceivability

Similar books and articles

Reliability and the a priori.Ernest Sosa - 2002 - In Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 369--384.
Modal Inquiry: An Epistemological Study.Gordon Barnes - 2000 - Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Reliability and.Ernest Sosa - 2002 - In Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 369.
The Inconceivability Argument.Brian Cutter - 2022 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
81 (#212,073)

6 months
364 (#5,362)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Murphy
University of Indianapolis

Citations of this work

Nothing.Naomi Thompson - 2010 - Dissertation, University of Birmingham

Add more citations