The Tendential Theory of Sporting Prowess

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 41 (3):399-412 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The results of sport would not interest us if either they were necessitated or they were a matter of pure chance. And if either case were true, the playing of sport would seem to make no sense either. This poses a dilemma. But there is something between these two options, namely the dispositional modality. Sporting prowess can be understood as a disposition towards victory and sporting liabilities a disposition towards defeat. The sporting contest then pits these net prowesses against each other. The stronger will tend to beat the weaker but no more than tend. This makes sense of the sporting contest in which the weaker knows they still can win. The stronger team can lose though they do not tend to do so. The dilemma is thus escaped

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two concepts of sporting excellence.Steffen Borge - 2024 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 51 (2):302-315.
Determinism and sporting prowess: A response to Mumford and Anjum.Benjamin Smart - 2017 - South African Journal of Philosophy 36 (2):217-222.
On Sporting Integrity.Alfred Archer - 2016 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 10 (2):117-131.
Suffering and Schadenfreude in sport.Sean Foley & Michael Rohlf - 2023 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 50 (1):133-147.
A Confucian mutualist theory of sport.Alexander Pho - 2023 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 50 (2):256-280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-22

Downloads
94 (#179,766)

6 months
25 (#143,483)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Stephen Mumford
Durham University
Rani Anjum
University of Tromsø (PhD)

Citations of this work

Simon on Luck and Desert in Sport: A Review and Some Comments.Sigmund Loland - 2016 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43 (1):15-25.
A Not-So-Beautiful Game.Graham McFee - 2015 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 9 (2):166-181.
Is Competitive Elite Sport Really Morally Corrupt?Rognvaldur Ingthorsson - 2017 - Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research 75 (1):05–14.
Sport, meritocracy, and praise.Nicholas Dixon - 2021 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 48 (2):275-292.
Breakthrough victories: How can a loser ever win?Paul Gaffney - 2017 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 11 (1):3-11.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Getting Causes From Powers.Stephen Mumford & Rani Lill Anjum - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. Edited by Rani Lill Anjum.
The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia.Bernard Suits & Thomas Hurka - 1978 - Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press.
Powers: A Study in Metaphysics.George Molnar - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Stephen Mumford.
Laws in nature.Stephen Mumford - 2004 - New York: Routledge.

View all 30 references / Add more references