The Baby Doe Rule: Still a Threat

Hastings Center Report 16 (2):8-14 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Current federal policy, as reflected in the final Baby Doe rule, will have a chilling effect on the ability of doctors to care appropriately for severely disabled infants. The policy threatens to prolong life unjustifiably for such infants. It will force physicians to violate a duty to do no harm without compensating benefit. And it raises serious problems for the just distribution of health care.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Final, Anticlimactic Rude on Baby Doe.Thomas H. Murray - 1985 - Hastings Center Report 15 (3):5-9.
Treating Baby Doe: The Ethics of Uncertainty.Nancy K. Rhoden - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (4):34-42.
Disconnecting the Baby Doe Hotline.George J. Annas - 1983 - Hastings Center Report 13 (3):14-16.
Baby Jane Doe in the Courts.Bonnie Steinbock - 1984 - Hastings Center Report 14 (1):13-19.
Reporting the Case of Baby Jane Doe.Kathleen Kerr - 1984 - Hastings Center Report 14 (4):7-9.
The Case of Baby Jane Doe.Carol Levine - 1984 - Hastings Center Report 14 (1):10-10.
The Baby Doe Regulations: Another View of Change.William B. Weil - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (2):12-13.
Let's Take Baby Doe to Alaska.Kathleen Nolan - 1990 - Hastings Center Report 20 (1):3-3.
At Law: Checkmating the Baby Doe Regulations.George J. Annas - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (4):29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
13 (#1,042,873)

6 months
5 (#837,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references