On the impossibility of rigid designators

Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):421-433 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kripke's paradigm rigid designator directly refers without describing, Yet carries some type of content or import over and above its reference to a particular referent. Pursuant to my discussion of linguistic convention, I argue that all referring expressions must be either descriptions or what I call "labels," and that under neither rubric can a referring expression fill both the above roles

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rigid designation.Hugh S. Chandler - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (13):363-369.
A Puzzle about Properties.Berit Brogaard - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):635-650.
Rigid Kind Terms.Jussi Haukioja - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:55-61.
Are proper names rigid designators?Pierre Baumann - 2010 - Axiomathes 20 (2-3):333-346.
Against a posteriori moral naturalism.David Barnett - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (3):239 - 257.
Rigid designation and semantic structure.Arthur Sullivan - 2007 - Philosophers' Imprint 7:1-22.
Causality, referring, and proper names.David S. Schwarz - 1978 - Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (2):225 - 233.
Rigid designators: Two applications.Michael Levin - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (2):283-294.
Rigid designators.Joseph LaPorte - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-15

Downloads
43 (#366,753)

6 months
6 (#508,473)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references