Reference theories and the relevance of descriptions

Manuscrito 43 (4):74-85 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mario Gómez-Torrente is a fundamental contribution to the issue of reference and especially of reference fixing. In this article I will focus on some questions addressed in it, especially on the relationships between some components of Kripke’s, Putnam’s and Gómez-Torrente’s theories of reference fixing as well as on the relevance of descriptions for those theories; I will then make some observations about Gómez-Torrente’s view of the reference-fixing conventions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-10

Downloads
11 (#1,146,652)

6 months
7 (#592,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luis Moreno
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Meaning and reference.Hilary Putnam - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):699-711.
Meaning and Reference.Hilary Putnam - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 299-308.
Explanation and reference.Hilary Putnam - 1973 - In Glenn Pearce & Patrick Maynard (eds.), Conceptual change. Boston,: D. Reidel. pp. 196--214.

View all 8 references / Add more references