Genomics might not be the solution, but epistemic validity remains a challenge in the social sciences

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e221 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We sympathize with many of the points Burt makes in challenging the value of genetics to advance our understanding of social science. Here, we discuss how recent reflections on epistemic validity in the behavioral sciences can further contribute to a reappraisal of the role of sociogenomics to explain and predict human traits, aptitudes, and achievement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genomics and the intrinsic value of plants.Bart Gremmen - 2005 - Genomics, Society and Policy 1 (3):1-7.
Animal Genomics in Science, Social Science and Culture.Matthew Harvey - 2007 - Genomics, Society and Policy 3 (2):1-28.
The Future of DTC Genomics and the Law.Henry T. Greely - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (1):151-160.
Causal Comparability, Causal Generalizations, and Epistemic Homogeneity.Rosa W. Runhardt - 2017 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (3):183-208.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-12

Downloads
4 (#1,618,541)

6 months
3 (#962,966)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references