Utilitarianism

Ethics (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter and the one that follows analyze and elucidate the normative structure of utilitarianism. Although Moore did not consider himself a utilitarian, it becomes evident as the book proceeds that he accepts utilitarianism’s consequentialist account of right and wrong despite rejecting its hedonistic value theory. These opening chapters are a model of analytic exposition as Moore lays out utilitarianism’s theoretical commitments and contrasts various distinct but closely related normative theses. Moore expounds the utilitarian theory with far greater precision than the classical utilitarian thinkers ever achieved.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Free Will.G. E. Moore - 2006 - Ethics.
Results the Test of Right and Wrong.G. E. Moore - 1997 - In Thomas L. Carson & Paul K. Moser (eds.), Morality and the good life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1874 - Bristol, U.K.: Kaplan.
Ethics: the nature of moral philosophy.G. E. Moore (ed.) - 2005 - New York : Oxford University Press,: Clarendon Press ;.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
890 (#16,247)

6 months
5 (#632,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Geoff Moore
Durham University

Citations of this work

The Place of Animals in Christian America.Gerald E. Jones - 1985 - Between the Species 1 (2):5.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references